Bug 1161177
| Summary: | Request for update to 2.6.4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Richard Shaw <hobbes1069> |
| Component: | fpc | Assignee: | Joost van der Sluis <joost> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | joost, tsmetana |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-04-21 19:27:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1150453 | ||
|
Description
Richard Shaw
2014-11-06 15:14:20 UTC
I have been able to build an updated package but it was non-trivial. For some reason the fcl-web and fastcgi packages use what I would call a more traditional style makefile while the other packages do not.
For whatever reason the install locations for these two was going into /usr/lib on x86_64 instead of /usr/lib64, but only when using the distinstall target. If the plain install target was used it was fine but then the examples were not installed. The fix was to install both separately:
make packages_install ${INSTALLOPTS}
make packages_exampleinstall ${INSTALLOPTS}
Although this should not be necessary and should be reported upstream.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 I saw the build for rawhide, any chance we can get at least through f21? I think you mean f22? Did you test the rawhide build, and does it work? If you can confirm that, I can update f22. Well, I meant f22 through f21 (I'm not too worried about f20 at this point). I don't want to leave my package, cqrlog, un-updated in a Fedora release that still has a lot of "life" left in it. Assuming you updated the packge using my comments from above it should be fine. I used it in a COPR repository to get updated packages of cqrlog out. Lazarus is another story (and another BZ#). I only updated to the latest release and I see you built a release candidate so I need to test that part. fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22,lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22,lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22 Package fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22, lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22 lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5303/fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22,lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22 then log in and leave karma (feedback). fpc-2.6.4-1.fc22, lazarus-1.4-0.2.RC2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |