Bug 1161293
| Summary: | Review Request: fedora-productimg-server - Installer branding and configuration for Fedora Server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Miller <mattdm> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, sgallagh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sgallagh:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | fedora-productimg-workstation-21-2.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-11-10 06:07:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Matthew Miller
2014-11-06 20:35:00 UTC
Changed license to CC0: Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/fedora-productimg-server.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/fedora-productimg-server-21-1.fc21.mattdm.src.rpm For the record, the license change was made at my request offline as part of this review. This package is very simplistic (it only adds a few specialized symlinks), so the only real Packaging Guidelines it needs to match are: * License: OK * Naming Guidelines: OK * Spec in English: OK * No file conflicts: FAIL So, one more go-around, I think. Conflict with other productimg packages: Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/fedora-productimg-server.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/fedora-productimg-server-21-2.fc21.mattdm.src.rpm I think we might want to ask for a blanket exception to the file conflicts rule here, as increasing numbers of productimg packages would be a combinatorial explosion of complexity, whereas without one could simply add a fedora-productimg-spin-kde (for example), with no fuss. But for now, done by the book. (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #4) > I think we might want to ask for a blanket exception to the file conflicts > rule here, as increasing numbers of productimg packages would be a > combinatorial explosion of complexity, whereas without one could simply add > a fedora-productimg-spin-kde (for example), with no fuss. > > But for now, done by the book. I agree, let's file an FPC ticket later. In the meantime, approved. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-productimg-server Short Description: Installer branding and configuration for Fedora Server Upstream URL: n/a Owners: mattdm sgallagh Branches: f21 InitialCC: Upstream URL is invalid. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-productimg-server Short Description: Installer branding and configuration for Fedora Server Upstream URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server Owners: mattdm sgallagh Branches: f21 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). fedora-productimg-workstation-21-2.fc21,fedora-productimg-server-21-2.fc21,fedora-productimg-cloud-21-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-productimg-workstation-21-2.fc21,fedora-productimg-server-21-2.fc21,fedora-productimg-cloud-21-2.fc21 fedora-productimg-workstation-21-2.fc21, fedora-productimg-server-21-2.fc21, fedora-productimg-cloud-21-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |