Bug 1161642

Summary: As a user, I wish to add guest subscriptions from different hypervisors to a single activation key
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Tom McKay <tomckay>
Component: CandlepinAssignee: William Poteat <wpoteat>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: jcallaha
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.4CC: andreas.pfaffeneder, annica.m.eriksson, bbuckingham, caugello, cperry, cwelton, jcallaha, kallisti5, ktordeur, mtaru, sudo, wlehman, wpoteat
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-12 05:18:48 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 971511    

Description Tom McKay 2014-11-07 14:36:39 UTC
The new activation key code that allows the "auto-attach" option should allow adding generated "unlimited" guest subscriptions to an activation key, even if from different hypervisors. 

The use case is a single activation key that may be used by any guest, no matter which hypervisor it is provisioned on.

Comment 2 Tom McKay 2014-11-20 13:30:03 UTC
Merged to candlepin

Comment 4 Tom McKay 2015-01-07 13:39:05 UTC
*** Bug 1179670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 jcallaha 2015-02-13 19:57:00 UTC
Verified.

Version Tested:
Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-6-20150210.0
Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-7-20150210.0

Comment 10 William 2015-04-14 17:44:01 UTC
*** Bug 1209481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Annica 2015-04-15 11:30:18 UTC
(In reply to Tom McKay from comment #0)
> The new activation key code that allows the "auto-attach" option should
> allow adding generated "unlimited" guest subscriptions to an activation key,
> even if from different hypervisors. 
> 
> The use case is a single activation key that may be used by any guest, no
> matter which hypervisor it is provisioned on.

But I want use activationkeys so that I can attach the VM to a specific Lifecycle Environment.

Comment 14 Annica 2015-05-12 06:27:27 UTC
Yes I still need to create one activationkey for each contentview and then for echa Environment......

Comment 15 William Poteat 2015-05-18 11:58:44 UTC
But this BZ is to allow multiple hypervisors on a single key.

If that capability is available, please conclude this issue and begin a new one.

Comment 16 Magnus Glantz 2015-05-18 12:05:46 UTC
This is something that we need as well (multiple hypervisors in a single key). We have +100 hypervisors in play..

Comment 17 Clifford Perry 2015-05-18 12:27:05 UTC
Folks in GSS and anyone cc'd or commenting. This RFE is approved and already verified for the Satellite 6.1 release. Consider this RFE DONE. 

If you have new requests for new features and enhancements to the behaviour of Activation Keys - please open NEW RFE's and attach the customer cases there. Myself, nor others will act on comments in this bug asking for more stuff. They need to be broken into their own RFEs and triaged and approved on a case-by-case basis. The Satellite 6.1 release is feature frozen, so RFEs will be considered for future releases. 

The general process for submitting RFEs can be found here: 

https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-110680#jive_content_id_Red_Hat_Satellite__Proxy

If you have questions on the GSS RFE process, please work with your local GSS supervisor or Xixi. 

Regards,
Cliff

Comment 18 Bryan Kearney 2015-08-11 13:26:13 UTC
This bug is slated to be released with Satellite 6.1.

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-12 05:18:48 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1592