Bug 1162993

Summary: (statismo) Review Request: statismo
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Arnaud Gelas <arnaudgelas>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-12-08 10:48:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
spec file none

Description Arnaud Gelas 2014-11-12 07:50:06 UTC
Created attachment 956587 [details]
spec file

Description:
Statismo is a c++ framework for statistical shape modeling. It supports all shape modeling tasks, from model building to shape analysis. Although the main focus of statismo lies on shape modeling, it is designed such that it supports any kind of PCA based statistical model, including statistical deformation models and intensiy models. One of the main goals of statismo is to make the exchange of statistical shape models easy. This is achieved by using a well documented file format based on HDF5.

Comment 1 Antonio T. (sagitter) 2014-12-07 18:56:12 UTC
This is not right way to review a package. 
Please, read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process.

Comment 2 Arnaud Gelas 2014-12-08 09:18:15 UTC
Hi Antonio,

I have read the instructions and have just opened the following issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171624

Let me know if I should close this one or move info & links from the new issue (and close it) to this one.

thanks in advance
Best
Arnaud

Comment 3 Antonio T. (sagitter) 2014-12-08 10:48:33 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1171624 ***