Bug 1163002

Summary: Should add "Windows 2012R2 x64" as vm operating system options
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: wanghui <huiwa>
Component: ovirt-engineAssignee: Shmuel Melamud <smelamud>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Nisim Simsolo <nsimsolo>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.4.4CC: bazulay, cshao, gklein, huiwa, istein, leiwang, lsurette, michal.skrivanek, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sherold, srevivo, yaniwang, ycui, ykaul
Target Milestone: ovirt-3.6.0-rc   
Target Release: 3.6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-04-20 01:36:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Virt RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
guest operating system options none

Description wanghui 2014-11-12 08:16:35 UTC 
Created attachment 956615 [details]
guest operating system options

Description of problem:
It should add "Windows 2012R2 x64" as vm operating system options in RHEV-M 3.4.z according to Administration guide[1].

[1]http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.4/html/Administration_Guide/Supported_virtual_machines.html

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Version: 3.4.4-1.4.el6ev

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Register rhev-hypervisor6-6.6-20141029.0.iso to rhevm3.4.
2. Create a vm and choose vm operating system.

Actual results:
1. After step2, there miss the "Windows 2012R2 x64" options as guest operating system.

Expected results:
1. It should provide the "Windows 2012R2 x64" options as guest operating system。

Additional info:
Comment 1 Omer Frenkel 2014-11-12 11:49:46 UTC 
The documentation link lists the supported OS, but we don't have all of the different options to select in the UI, since there is no real configuration difference between win2012 & win2012r2 (same correct for 2003 and 2003r2)
there is no point to have different selections here.

on the 2008 case, there is configuration difference, so there is a specific selection for it.

suggesting to close as wont-fix as there is no point in adding this.
any objections?
Comment 2 Michal Skrivanek 2014-11-12 12:47:20 UTC 
+1

maybe add "2012+" to the name?
Comment 3 Omer Frenkel 2014-11-18 07:34:22 UTC 
i doubt someone will understand this
pushing to 3.6 for now
Comment 4 wanghui 2014-11-20 03:06:01 UTC 
It's ok for me.

(In reply to Omer Frenkel from comment #1)
> The documentation link lists the supported OS, but we don't have all of the
> different options to select in the UI, since there is no real configuration
> difference between win2012 & win2012r2 (same correct for 2003 and 2003r2)
> there is no point to have different selections here.
> 
> on the 2008 case, there is configuration difference, so there is a specific
> selection for it.
> 
> suggesting to close as wont-fix as there is no point in adding this.
> any objections?
Comment 5 Scott Herold 2014-12-17 03:52:47 UTC 
While this may not require different settings to build the underlying VM, it is technically considered a different Operating System by Microsoft and end users.  I'd recommend creating the entry for 2012R2 explicitly in 3.6.
Comment 6 Nisim Simsolo 2015-05-04 14:36:58 UTC 
Fixed. Verified using 3.6.0-0.0.master.20150412172306.git55ba764.el6