Bug 1164564

Summary:	Please add EPEL7 branch
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Matěj Cepl <mcepl>
Component:	josm	Assignee:	Cédric OLIVIER <cedric.olivier>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	22	CC:	cedric.olivier, jgrulich, mcepl
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-12-09 21:12:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1193626, 1193630
Bug Blocks:

Description Matěj Cepl 2014-11-16 14:24:56 UTC

What could I add? Perhaps, just that I am willing to co-maintain the branch.

Comment 1 Matěj Cepl 2014-11-17 22:48:54 UTC

All required packages are built in http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mcepl/josm-epel7/

Comment 2 Cédric OLIVIER 2014-11-19 18:26:06 UTC

I would be happy to co-maintain epel branch with you.

Could you give me your FAS, if you agree to co-maintain josm in epel branch ?

Comment 3 Matěj Cepl 2014-11-19 20:01:40 UTC

(In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #0)
> What could I add? Perhaps, just that I am willing to co-maintain the branch.

I am a boring guy, just my Red Hat login: mcepl.

Comment 4 Cédric OLIVIER 2014-11-20 18:18:22 UTC

epel 7 branch request done for :

josm
svgsalamander
signpost-core

do you prefer that I request for epel7 for metadata-extractor2 and xmpcore and perhaps libappstream-glib or do you want to do it yourself.

Comment 5 Matěj Cepl 2014-11-24 23:59:08 UTC

I would rather do a minimum ... I really don't know much about packaging Java packages.

Comment 6 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 17:05:32 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22