Bug 11648

Summary: with this lvs.cf the 2 virtual servers are not being added
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: cono_delia
Component: piranhaAssignee: Phil Copeland <copeland>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-05-26 01:04:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
lvs.cf file
none
messages generated from piranha at start up
none
ipvsadm output file none

Description Red Hat Bugzilla 2000-05-25 03:09:58 UTC
This lvs.cf consists of 4 virtual servers:

lvs1: 2 real servers, 1800 persistence, http(wml) (not added)
lvs2: 1 real server, smtp (added)
lvs3: 2 real servers, 1800 persistence, https (not added)
lvs4: 2 real servers, 1800 persistence, http(html) (added)


Afer looking at the message logs there is no attempt to add the
realservers for lvs1 or lvs3. I can't explain why this is the case. I
created the lvs.cf using the gui interface and made certain to hit every
button to ensure that all the parameters are written to the file.
I included my lvs.cf, the messages log containing the piranha messages,
and the output of the routing table after piranha is started.

How come piranha is not adding these virtual servers??


Thanks,

Cono
email: cono_delia

Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla 2000-05-26 00:47:59 UTC
Created attachment 269 [details]
lvs.cf file

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2000-05-26 00:49:59 UTC
Created attachment 270 [details]
messages generated from piranha at start up

Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2000-05-26 01:04:59 UTC
Created attachment 271 [details]
ipvsadm output file

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2000-06-13 00:23:29 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11649 ***