Bug 1168120

Summary: yum check description in manpage contain paragraph from yum history
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Karel Srot <ksrot>
Component: yumAssignee: Valentina Mukhamedzhanova <vmukhame>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Karel Srot <ksrot>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.1CC: james.antill, vmukhame
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: yum-3.4.3-126.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No docs needed
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 12:38:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Karel Srot 2014-11-26 08:09:53 UTC
Description of problem:

The second paragraph of the text below belongs to the yum history command section, not yum check.

yum-3.4.3-124.el7.noarch

see man yum

-----------------------------------------------

       check  Checks  the  local  rpmdb and produces information on any problems it finds. You can pass the
              check command the arguments "dependencies", "duplicates", "obsoletes" or "provides", to limit
              the checking that is performed (the default is "all" which does all).

              The  info command can also take ranges of transaction ids, of the form start..end, which will
              then display a merged history as if all the transactions in the range had happened at once.
              Eg. "history info 1..4" will merge the first four transactions and display them as  a  single
              transaction.

-------------------------------------------------

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 12:38:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2095.html