Bug 1168240

Summary: Clarify section on "domain" vs "zone"
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: David O'Brien <daobrien>
Component: Docs Provisioning GuideAssignee: David O'Brien <daobrien>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Hayley Hudgeons <hhudgeon>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0.4CC: hhudgeon, shughes
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-28 03:42:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Deadline: 2015-04-03   

Description David O'Brien 2014-11-26 13:32:42 UTC
Description of problem:

Comment from Shannon Hughes:

>> section 2.1 configuring dns,dhcp,and tftp
>>
>> "This section also describes how to configure Satellite to run BIND
>>   (named) hosting the example.org zone and the
>> 13.17.172.in-addr.arpa DNS zone. Further, it describes how to
>> configure the TFTP proxy so that systems can boot using PXE."
>>
>> * a bit of a nit pick but really we are talking about forward and
>> reverse zones here. the example.org is usually referred to in
>> context as a zone file. and 13.17.172.in-addr.arpa is the file
>> housing the ptr type records0.
> Can you elaborate on what you would actually change here? DNS is the
> topic I love to hate, so I'm quite open to "write this instead"
> suggestions.

 'hosting the example.org' would really be "domain" and not "zone". the domain is hosted. this is accomplished by setting up forward and reverse zones in the example.org zone file and the ptr record zone file containing the reverse zone 13.17.172.in-addr.arpa 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

1.0-0


Additional info:

As mentioned, this is not really a bug, but could be worded better for clarity.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-11-26 13:33:36 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2015-02-16 05:43:07 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 5 David O'Brien 2015-02-16 06:38:43 UTC
Cleaning up flags for easier reporting.

Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2015-02-16 06:43:19 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 12 David O'Brien 2015-06-10 05:58:42 UTC
Hayley, Shannon,
What's the chances of getting this reviewed real quick so I can branch for beta and translation?
thanks

Comment 13 David O'Brien 2015-06-23 01:01:16 UTC
This went out with beta.