Bug 1169390
Summary: | content host reported by virt-who does not coincide with content host of hypervisor | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | David Juran <djuran> |
Component: | Subscription Management | Assignee: | Michael Stead <mstead> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | Unspecified | CC: | ahumbe, bbuckingham, bkearney, cwelton, dgoodwin, fdeutsch, tomckay |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Reopened, Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9383 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-04-08 17:46:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Juran
2014-12-01 14:27:29 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. @dgoodwin - is this fixed in a newer version of virt-who? Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9383 from this bug I'm afraid I'm not sure how this is supposed to work with virt-who. Radeck: is this a situation where virt-who should be running on each individual hypervisor? The bulk update virt-who mode is assumed to be running in an environment where the hosts are third-party and not already registered to Satellite afaik. I think we can probably close this, I believe the solution here is to install and start virt-who service on each hypervisor host. No configuration should be necessary for virt-who, out of the box it should know how to just report guest IDs for that hypervisor. The mode in use in original report is (I believe) intended for deployments where the hypervisors are not registered to the entitlement platform. (ESX, presumably some RHEV installs as well) If they are registered, virt-who service knows how to report for just the host it's running on. Tentatively closing, Radeck may be able to confirm but this is the best information I have available right now. Reopening, it appears virt-who is not installed on RHEVB hypervisors. (via Thomas Dosek) We need to either install virt-who there, and verify it is capable of reporting the hypervisors ID, or find a way to implement some magic in virt-who to merge consumer records reported by virt-who with those actually registered. (which seems like it will be quite challenging) Adding Fabian Duetsch, Fabian could you help us confirm if this could/should be done? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1209608 *** |