Bug 117132

Summary: wb 2, ch 6: Question 3 is very similar to ch 3, question 2
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Academy Reporter: Johnathan Kupferer <kupferer>
Component: RHA030 CurriculumAssignee: Bowe Strickland <bowe>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Bowe Strickland <bowe>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://academy.redhat.com/courses/rha030-2.0/rha030_filesystem_fileglob_questions.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-03-16 11:48:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Johnathan Kupferer 2004-02-29 05:10:28 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)
Gecko/20031114

Description of problem:
Workbook 2. Filesystem Basics
Chapter 6. Examining Files
Questions: #3

Question 3 is:

Which of the following commands would act the same as cp a.txt b.txt,
assuming the file b.txt does not exist?
A. 	cat -5 a.txt b.txt
B. 	cat a.txt b.txt
C. 	cat -A a.txt > b.txt
D. 	cat a.txt > b.txt
E. 	None of the above.


Which seems quite similar to question 2 in chapter 3:

To copy file1.txt to file2.txt, you could use
A. 	cp file1.txt > file2.txt
B. 	cat file1.txt > file2.txt
C. 	dupe file1.txt file2.txt
D. 	mv file1.txt file2.txt


Maybe the chapter 3 question should be altered... the 'cat' there is a
little sneaky to ask quite so early.  How about "cp file1.txt
file2.txt" instead?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
n/a
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Bowe Strickland 2004-03-10 14:17:38 UTC
fixed...