Bug 1172042

Summary:	2.3.2. Managed Database Requirements: example mentions "192.168.1.0/0.0.0.255" which is incorrect
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component:	Docs Installation Guide	Assignee:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Dan Macpherson <dmacpher>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	560	CC:	tlestach
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-10-21 03:19:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1018166

Description Jan Hutař 2014-12-09 09:44:52 UTC

Description of problem:
In section "2.3.2. Managed Database Requirements" there is example output which  mentions "192.168.1.0/0.0.0.255" which is incorrect


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Current Satellite 5.6 documentation on https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Satellite/5.6/html/Installation_Guide/sect-Installation_Guide-Managed_Database_Requirements.html


How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. # ./install.pl --managed-db


Actual results:
[...]
Remote addresses to allow connection from (address/netmask format, comma-separated): 192.168.1.0/0.0.0.255
[...]


Expected results:
Remote addresses to allow connection from (address/netmask format, comma-separated): 192.168.1.10/32


Additional info:
"192.168.1.0/0.0.0.255" does not translate to meaningful IP address and also is not accepted by install.pl script now (Satellite-5.7.0-RHEL6-re20141205.0-s390x - have not tested on 5.6)

Comment 1 Tomas Lestach 2014-12-09 14:19:00 UTC

Dan, do you think you could address the bug for Sat5.7?

Comment 2 Dan Macpherson 2014-12-11 02:25:14 UTC

Absolutely.

Comment 3 Dan Macpherson 2014-12-31 01:31:32 UTC

Have corrected the netmask example.

Comment 6 Dan Macpherson 2015-10-21 03:19:26 UTC

Now using proper address/netmask for both 5.7 and 5.6:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Satellite/5.7/html/Installation_Guide/sect-Scenario_2_Installing_Satellite_with_Managed_Database.html

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Satellite/5.6/html/Installation_Guide/sect-Installation_Guide-Managed_Database_Requirements.html

Closing bug.