Bug 1172238
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Šabata <psabata> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, ppisar |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | ppisar:
fedora-review?
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-12-10 09:13:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 |
Description
Petr Šabata
2014-12-09 16:49:00 UTC
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Source0 archive is original (SHA-256: ec8987517d138ac8a4be3c72ba36d69e06f18378a284f6df03c4f954ceaedaa8). Ok. FATAL: rmd160.c, rmd160.h (and files in under rmd160 which are not used for building) have wrong license: /********************************************************************\ * * FILE: rmd160.c * * CONTENTS: A sample C-implementation of the RIPEMD-160 * hash-function. * TARGET: any computer with an ANSI C compiler * * AUTHOR: Antoon Bosselaers, ESAT-COSIC * DATE: 1 March 1996 * VERSION: 1.0 * * Copyright (c) Katholieke Universiteit Leuven * 1996, All Rights Reserved * \********************************************************************/ Nothing has changed since Crypt-RIPEMD160-0.04. See another review bug #452453. You need formal statement from the "Katholieke Universiteit Leuven" granting you rights required by the Fedora project. After reading the old bug, seeing the statement from the author wasn't formal enough and the notice in the package isn't sufficient, there isn't much I can (or am willing to) do about this one. Closing. |