Bug 1173952
Summary: | video freeze on switching channels | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stas Sergeev <stsp2> |
Component: | xawtv | Assignee: | Dmitry Butskoy <dmitry> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | dmitry, mchehab |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-12-27 23:25:24 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Stas Sergeev
2014-12-14 12:45:01 UTC
ioctl: VIDIOC_REQBUFS(count=0;type=VIDEO_CAPTURE;memory=MMAP): Device or resource busy ioctl: VIDIOC_REQBUFS(count=2;type=VIDEO_CAPTURE;memory=MMAP): Device or resource busy Warning: Non-character code(s) in source. Warning: Non-character code(s) in source. ioctl: VIDIOC_QBUF(index=0;type=VIDEO_CAPTURE;bytesused=221184;flags=0x2003 [MAPPED,QUEUED,(null)];field=BOTTOM;;timecode.type=0;timecode.flags=0;timecode.frames=0;timecode.seconds=0;timecode.minutes=0;timecode.hours=0;timecode.userbits="";sequence=0;memory=MMAP): Device or resource busy libv4l2: error dequeuing buf: Device or resource busy ioctl: VIDIOC_DQBUF(index=0;type=VIDEO_CAPTURE;bytesused=0;flags=0x0 [];field=ANY;;timecode.type=0;timecode.flags=0;timecode.frames=0;timecode.seconds=0;timecode.minutes=0;timecode.hours=0;timecode.userbits="";sequence=0;memory=MMAP): Device or resource busy ioctl: VIDIOC_REQBUFS(count=0;type=VIDEO_CAPTURE;memory=MMAP): Device or resource busy v4l2: read: Invalid argument What can this mean? Maybe xawtv now tries to open the new channel somehow before closing the previous one? Just a wild guess. The fix is posted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155784#c5 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1155784 *** |