Bug 1175540
Summary: | Backport patches enabling TLS 1.1 and better to spice-server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | David Jaša <djasa> |
Component: | spice | Assignee: | Default Assignee for SPICE Bugs <rh-spice-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | dblechte, djasa, lmiksik, marcandre.lureau, tpelka |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 7.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | spice-0.12.4-9.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause: spice-server uses exclusively TLS version 1.0 for encrypted connections no matter what version(s) the client advertises.
Consequence: newer versions of TLS cannot be used
Fix: spice-server code was changed to allow TLS 1.0 or newer
Result: clients can connect using versions of TLS newer than 1.0
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 07:56:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Jaša
2014-12-18 01:18:26 UTC
It seems the only patch required is: commit 4fc9ba5f27dd4c04441d38c893ee962da01baf80 Author: David Jaša <djasa> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 27 17:45:49 2013 +0100 Commit: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau> CommitDate: Thu Dec 12 10:39:11 2013 +0100 If qa is ok for a new build, I think this bug is important enought for 7.1 exception. Can it get exception+ too? David, this patch is already in 6.6, so I think it should also be in upcoming 7.1 release. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0335.html |