Bug 1175602

I'm sorry for the delay (various holiday and other work stuff. :-)).

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
     independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
     (In generated docs)
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
     OK: ruby -e "require 'glut'; p Glut:VERSION"
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

Ruby:
[-]: Test suite of the library should be run.
     Note: OK, not available and explained in the spec.
[x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package.
[x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem.
[x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: rubygem-glut-8.2.1-1.fc22.i686.rpm
          rubygem-glut-doc-8.2.1-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
          rubygem-glut-8.2.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
rubygem-glut.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) opengl -> opening
rubygem-glut.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opengl -> opening
rubygem-glut.i686: E: zero-length /usr/lib/gems/ruby/glut-8.2.1/gem.build_complete
rubygem-glut.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) opengl -> opening
rubygem-glut.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opengl -> opening
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@forkys2 /]# rpmlint rubygem-glut rubygem-glut-doc
rubygem-glut.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) opengl -> opening
rubygem-glut.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opengl -> opening
rubygem-glut.i686: E: zero-length /usr/lib/gems/ruby/glut-8.2.1/gem.build_complete
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@forkys2 /]# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
rubygem-glut (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libGL.so.1
    libc.so.6
    libcrypt.so.1
    libdl.so.2
    libglut.so.3
    libm.so.6
    libpthread.so.0
    libruby.so.2.1
    rtld(GNU_HASH)
    ruby(rubygems)

rubygem-glut-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    rubygem-glut



Provides
--------
rubygem-glut:
    rubygem(glut)
    rubygem-glut
    rubygem-glut(x86-32)

rubygem-glut-doc:
    rubygem-glut-doc



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
rubygem-glut: /usr/lib/gems/ruby/glut-8.2.1/glut/glut.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://rubygems.org/gems/glut-8.2.1.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : fb9e4b9d3b6995eef65de7ffbcc5390106d1306017295fdd2ae75ced5e70c889
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fb9e4b9d3b6995eef65de7ffbcc5390106d1306017295fdd2ae75ced5e70c889


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1175602 -m fedora-rawhide-i386
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

=====

No issues found.

Some cosmetics things, which can be ignored (probably not worth mentioning :-)):
- "opengl" could be written as "OpenGL" (as used in rubygem-opengl package)
- copying of MRI is slightly different from the example in guidelines:

mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}
cp -a .%{gem_extdir_mri}/{gem.build_complete,*.so} %{buildroot}%{gem_extdir_mri}/


Package APPROVED!

Thank you!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-glut
Short Description: Glut bindings for the opengl gem
Upstream URL: https://github.com/larskanis/glut
Owners: mtasaka
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Built on F-22/F-21, push request on F-21, closing.

Thank you for review and git procedure.