Bug 1175625
| Summary: | Update Fedora 20's Darktable to 1.6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Germano Massullo <germano.massullo> |
| Component: | darktable | Assignee: | Edouard Bourguignon <madko> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 20 | CC: | germano.massullo, kevin, madko |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-02-15 13:55:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Germano Massullo
2014-12-18 08:36:23 UTC
Could you please try darktable 1.6 from updates-testing. If ok I will push it to stable. What bugs are you talking about by the way? (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #1) > Could you please try darktable 1.6 from updates-testing. If ok I will push > it to stable. There is no 1.6 in updates testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/darktable http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/20/x86_64/ > What bugs are you talking about by the way? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095873 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136970 I created darktable-1.6.0-1.fc20.src.rpm https://germano.fedorapeople.org/darktable-1.6.0-1.fc20.src.rpm I would like to help as co-mantainer of Darktable, if you agree. what the difference with the src rpm from fedora repositories? I didn't push 1.6.0 to F20 because I had problem if config or cache files from previous version is present. So I kept this new version for the new Fedora. But now, people who have upgraded from F20 to F21 would have already reported problems I guess I can push 1.6.0 to F20. Since darktable is a very simple package, I have to ask what kind of help you would like to provide? darktable-1.6.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darktable-1.6.0-1.fc20 (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #4) > what the difference with the src rpm from fedora repositories? It is the same. (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #5) > Since darktable is a very simple package, I have to ask what kind of help > you would like to provide? I would like to improve my skills in software packaging and I want to start with a software that I enjoy and often use, but I respect you if you prefer to continue working on Darktable alone. I'm not really alone on darktable but I don't know how to add someone as a co-mantainer. I will check that. Do you already mantain some Fedora packages? (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #8) > Do you already mantain some Fedora packages? Not yet, but the BOINC mantainer is orphaning his package and I am going to take it. We are actually working on some known troubles that upstream developers are not fixing properly. ok give me your FAS login and I will add you as comantainer (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #10) > ok give me your FAS login and I will add you as comantainer germano I am going to sponsor Germano into the packagers group. Edouard (madko), please note that, according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer you as the primary maintainer of the package are expected to mentor the new comaintainer you asked to get sponsored. Of course, as his sponsor, I am also responsible and will be available for any questions. (Germano, you already know how to contact me over IRC and e-mail. :-) ) Germano, you are now sponsored into the packagers group. You can request comaintainership for darktable on: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/darktable and madko can then approve it. Kevin, the comaintainership has been approved. Thank you and Thanks Germano for your help. (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #14) > Kevin, the comaintainership has been approved. Thank you and Thanks Germano > for your help. Thank you too Edouard! Germano, I will add you to some of darktable outstanding bugs on Fedora, if you could take a look. (In reply to Edouard Bourguignon from comment #16) > Germano, I will add you to some of darktable outstanding bugs on Fedora, if > you could take a look. Yes, I am going to send you an e-mail so we keep the discussion separated from this bugreport darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21 Package darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1540/darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback). darktable-1.6.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. darktable-1.6.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darktable-1.6.1-1.fc20 darktable-1.6.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. darktable-1.6.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |