Bug 1175709
Summary: | Unable to start guest with hugepages and strict numa pinning | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Daniel Berrangé <berrange> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Libvirt Maintainers <libvirt-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | dyuan, honzhang, jdenemar, jmiao, jshortt, kimi.zhang, knoel, ovasik, rbalakri, sgordon, tvvcox |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | TestOnly |
Target Release: | 7.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-1.2.8-11.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-03-05 07:48:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1170484 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Daniel Berrangé
2014-12-18 12:47:47 UTC
The patch for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170484 has coincidentally fixed this problem too This is just another scenario which triggers the same code path fixed for bug 1170484. I'm changing this bug to test-only so that both scenarios are tested. This bug is fixed in latest libvirt-1.2.8-11.el7ost.x86_64: 1. add <numatune> to guest xml: #rpm -q libvirt libvirt-1.2.8-11.el7ost.x86_64 # virsh edit a ... <vcpu placement='auto'>4</vcpu> <numatune> <memory mode='strict' placement='auto'/> </numatune> ... 2. start guest # virsh start a Domain a started So the guest could start, and I change the status to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0323.html |