Bug 1177549
| Summary: | NetworkManager prefers userspace PPPoE to kernel PPPoE | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Simon Farnsworth <simon> | ||||
| Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 21 | CC: | dcbw, psimerda | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-12-02 06:35:30 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Simon Farnsworth
2014-12-28 23:10:21 UTC
Attached patch against F21's NM fixes this for me. I'll be filing a version of the patch against git master for upstream's consideration, and will update this bug when I've done so. Created attachment 980241 [details]
kernel pppoe patch
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742939 is the upstream report - there's a kernel patch to cover the reason for NetworkManager regressing to userspace PPPoE, and two patches to NetworkManager to make it able to use either PPPoE implementation and to sort out PPPoE MTUs. The kernel patch is in net-next since 2015-03-04. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=287f3a943fef58c5c73e42545169443be379222f Might also want this additional kernel patch. Simon, does Felix's patch here look legit? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/470384/ (In reply to Dan Williams from comment #5) > Might also want this additional kernel patch. Simon, does Felix's patch > here look legit? > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/470384/ It does, yes. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 21. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '21'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 21 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |