Bug 1183388
| Summary: | Update TurboGears Requires for python-dateutil | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pete Travis <me> |
| Component: | TurboGears | Assignee: | Luke Macken <lmacken> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | dcallagh, fschwarz, lmacken, me, pfrields, tremble, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-December/205006.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-09-28 06:33:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1126521 | ||
|
Description
Pete Travis
2015-01-18 21:06:24 UTC
Do you have any details about what is actually changed in dateutil 2.2 compared with 1.5, so that we can figure out if TurboGears will be affected or not? There is nothing useful here: https://labix.org/python-dateutil#head-b57873b28af6ab8b1c4ae48d522ce0c691abbdf2 Do I have to just download the two tarballs and diff them? See https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/master/NEWS. There's a new new relativedelta type, but things should be mostly backwards compatible. That's the impression I have based on NEWS and looking at the code a bit. I don't think there are any better docs. Thanks Zbigniew. The only dateutil module used in TurboGears is dateutil.rrule. I had a look through the diff 1.5..2.4 for dateutil/rrule.py and I didn't see anything that would break compatibility. The TurboGears code is part of the support for cron-like tasks, which I am not using, so I don't have any code I can use to try it out. But it seems like a safe enough bet. So unless Luke thinks otherwise, we can probably just close this and leave the requirement on python-dateutil. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 Seems like sticking with python-dateutil is fine. |