Bug 1184075

Summary: [rfe] 3-Way Replication support in AFR with Quorum enabled
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana <nsathyan>
Component: replicateAssignee: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Anil Shah <ashah>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rhgs-3.0CC: annair, asrivast, dpati, rhs-bugs, smohan, storage-qa-internal, vagarwal, vinaraya
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.0.4   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Synchronous three-way replication is now fully supported in Red Hat Storage volumes. Three-way replication yields best results when used in conjunction with JBODs that are configured with RAID-0 virtual disks on individual disks with one physical disk per brick. You can set quorum on three-way replicated volumes to prevent split-brain scenarios. You can create three-way replicated volumes on Amazon Web Servers (AWS).
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-26 06:35:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana 2015-01-20 14:41:29 UTC
This is a umbrella BZ to track the progress on supporting 3-Way AFR replication with Quorum enabled.

Comment 1 Anil Shah 2015-03-25 09:01:40 UTC
Tested client side quorum in 3-way-replication.
Hence marking this bug as verified.

Comment 2 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-25 09:46:22 UTC
*** Bug 850511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-26 06:35:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0682.html