Bug 1187742

Summary:	rebuild openldap with support for moznss
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Component:	openldap	Assignee:	Jan Synacek <jsynacek>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	rawhide	CC:	awilliam, jsynacek, jv+fedora, lslebodn, nkinder, phracek, rmeggins, robatino, sgallagh, ssorce, vashirov
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	AcceptedBlocker
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-20 13:08:51 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1043125

Description Rich Megginson 2015-01-30 18:56:10 UTC

Description of problem:

openldap was recently built against openssl in rawhide.  This breaks a number of applications such as 389, freeipa, dogtag, etc.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rawhide

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:

openldap is built with moznss

Additional info:

Comment 1 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 2015-01-30 19:02:37 UTC

Proposed as a Blocker for 22-beta by Fedora user sgallagh using the blocker tracking app because:

 This issue subtly (and sometimes non-subtly) breaks many features of the Domain Controller Role for Fedora Server.

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2015-02-02 17:51:12 UTC

Discussed at 2015-02-02 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-02-02-17.06.log.txt . Accepted as a Beta blocker - we trust sgallagh's assessment that it violates the given criterion. However, sgallagh, could we ask for a few more details on exactly what it breaks, so we can double check and do follow-up testing? Thanks.

Comment 3 Rich Megginson 2015-02-02 17:56:58 UTC

Specifically - it is going to break any outgoing LDAP TLS/SSL connection from any 389 related package.  So things like replication/chaining/pass-through-auth/windows sync from 389; most 389-admin/389-adminutil operations, including operations invoked via CGI from the 389-console packages; and 389-dsgw.  IPA will be affected because of replication and windows sync.

Comment 4 Nathan Kinder 2015-02-17 15:42:01 UTC

Is this going to be addressed for the upcoming F22 Alpha?  The non-backwards compatible change  to use openssl is going to break a number of features as mentioned in comment#1, and it should be reverted as soon as possible.