Bug 1188524

Summary: Review Request: nodejs-date-tokens - Convenient date formatting for templates
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: anish <apatil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Piotr Popieluch <piotr1212>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: anish.developer, apatil, package-review, piotr1212, zsvetlik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-01-07 10:35:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description anish 2015-02-03 06:40:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens.spec
SRPM URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Date tokens offers convenient ways to use date functions in mustache style templates
Fedora Account System Username:anishpatil

Comment 1 Piotr Popieluch 2015-02-25 21:21:30 UTC
Package fails to build with mock. You can run mock with:
mock --rebuild nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
to check if your package will build correctly. Please do a mock build before issue'ing a review request.

The error is caused by a missing 
BuildRequires: nodejs-packaging


rpmlint gives an error, you can run:
rpmlint package.spec package.rpm package.src.rpm
to check if your package is ok.

rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/nodejs-date-tokens.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-1.fc21.noarch.rpm 
nodejs-date-tokens.src: E: description-line-too-long C Date tokens offers convenient ways to use date functions in mustache style templates
nodejs-date-tokens.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Date tokens offers convenient ways to use date functions in mustache style templates
nodejs-date-tokens.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.

Comment 2 anish 2015-02-26 07:27:21 UTC
Hi Piotr,

Thank you for package review, please find upadated spec and srpms on 

Spec URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens.spec
SRPM URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-2.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 3 Piotr Popieluch 2015-02-26 21:38:51 UTC
Could you please remove the second %check section.

I have enabled the tests and they fail:

  date-tokens
    + dt
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions, if function called, should return current time 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions, if function called without param, should use param in dt() 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions, if function called with param, should use param 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions with tokens named with the prefix 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of functions with tokens named with the prefix and current time 
    + eval
      ✓ should return the tokens object of strings of eval'd dates 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of strings and should return current time 
      1) should return the tokens object of strings should use param in eval()
      ✓ should return the tokens object of strings with tokens named with the prefix 
      ✓ should return the tokens object of strings with tokens named with the prefix and return current 


  10 passing (14ms)
  1 failing

  1) date-tokens + eval should return the tokens object of strings should use param in eval():
     AssertionError: false == true
      at Context.<anonymous> (/home/piotr/rpmbuild/BUILD/node-date-tokens-0.0.2/test/date-tokens.test.js:86:13)
      at callFn (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runnable.js:223:21)
      at Test.Runnable.run (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runnable.js:216:7)
      at Runner.runTest (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:374:10)
      at /usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:452:12
      at next (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:299:14)
      at /usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:309:7
      at next (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:247:23)
      at Object._onImmediate (/usr/lib/node_modules/mocha/lib/runner.js:276:5)
      at processImmediate [as _immediateCallback] (timers.js:345:15)




Could you check why they fail? Tests are a good indicator if the library actually works as intended.

Comment 4 anish 2015-02-27 07:12:40 UTC
Thank you for your comments, test case is failing becuase there is a problem with test case result itself, I have created a new pull request in upstream to fix test case itself.
https://github.com/jprichardson/node-date-tokens/pull/2


Please fine new SRPM and spec as 

Spec URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens.spec
SRPM URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-3.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 5 Piotr Popieluch 2015-02-27 22:33:56 UTC
Good work for fixing the test!

Could you add the missing symlink for the dependencies?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js?rd=Node.js/Packagers#Symlinking_Dependencies

Comment 6 anish 2015-03-02 12:23:51 UTC
Hi Piotr,

Thank you!! Please find updated rpms and sprms on 


Spec URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens.spec
SRPM URL: https://anishpatil.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-date-tokens-0.0.2-4.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 7 Piotr Popieluch 2015-03-08 18:13:43 UTC
Please update Source0 to comply with github guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Github

Please move LICENSE from %doc to %license:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines


Please remove test/ from %doc. It's not needed to include tests in %doc

Comment 9 Piotr Popieluch 2015-07-06 19:38:39 UTC
Anish, any updates on this?

Comment 10 Piotr Popieluch 2015-10-17 11:53:17 UTC
This seems stalled, closing bug in one week.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 02:54:15 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days