Bug 1190323
| Summary: | On 'Discovery_rule page, host limit should be marked as mandatory variable and validation error needs to be rephrased | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Sachin Ghai <sghai> | ||||
| Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | orabin | ||||
| WebUI sub component: | Foreman | QA Contact: | Sachin Ghai <sghai> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | ||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | CC: | bkearney, jmontleo | ||||
| Version: | 6.1.0 | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Target Release: | Unused | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9366 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-08-12 05:23:58 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1193977 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Upstream bug assigned to orabin Upstream bug assigned to orabin Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9366 has been closed ------------- Ori Rabin Applied in changeset commit:foreman_discovery|4c104cf6b66cf35931153e7d5643f6defd5d96a3. Verified with snap11/rc5 (Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-7-20150407.1). Now if user leaves the host limit blank then UI auto sets the limit to '0' '0'== unlimited. Moving this to verified. This bug is slated to be released with Satellite 6.1. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1592 |
Created attachment 989128 [details] host limit is not marked as mandatory variable with (*).Also, If I set the host_limit blank, UI raises error "is not a number". which is misleading. Description of problem: On 'Discovery_rule page, host limit should be marked as mandatory variable with (*). If I set the host_limit blank, UI raises error "is not a number". which is misleading. I set the host_limit blank, so Ideally UI should raise error: Host_limit can't be blank. In short Host_limit should be consistent with Priority field. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-6-20150205.0 Sat6.1 Beta snap1 compose3 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a discovery rule with blank host_limit 2. 3. Actual results: host limit is not marked as mandatory variable with (*). If I set the host_limit blank, UI raises error "is not a number". which is misleading. Expected results: Host limit should be marked as mandatory variable with (*). If I set the host_limit blank, so Ideally UI should raise error: Host_limit can't be blank. Additional info: