Bug 119070

Summary: No option for splittree.py to omit building SRPM discs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Armijn Hemel <armijn>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mitr
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: FC4
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-15 16:04:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
simple patch which adds a --no_srpm option to splittree.py none

Description Armijn Hemel 2004-03-24 17:41:00 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)
Gecko/20031114

Description of problem:
In splittree.py it is not possible to omit the creation of trees for
SRPMS. In case when you don't have SRPMS (internal release inside a
company or a lab for instance) splittree will complain if you  
specify the amount of src-discs as 0:

for i in range(self.src_list[0], self.src_list[-1] + 1): IndexError:
list index out of range

Having an option that can let you turn off the creation of the SRPM
things would be convenient to have in some cases. Attached bug solves
it in a very very crude way by adding a new --no_srpm option, it would
be better to have the option 'src-discs 0' handle it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. when creating your own CDs don't have any SRPMS
2. set as option src-discs 0
3. splittree.py will complain and barf
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Armijn Hemel 2004-03-24 17:43:29 UTC
Created attachment 98834 [details]
simple patch which adds a --no_srpm option to splittree.py

This patch (few minute job) is a very crude way to force splittree into
ignoring SRPMS. An ideal solution would check whether the src-discs option is >
0.

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2005-02-02 16:43:35 UTC
Tweaked the patch to go off of --src-discs=0 instead.  But basically committed.