Bug 1190843
Summary: | Custom Fencing Agents Require CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping to be set to a value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Tobias Fiebig <tfiebig> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Eli Mesika <emesika> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | ecohen, eedri, emesika, gklein, iheim, lpeer, lsurette, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, tfiebig, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.6.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | infra | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-02-22 14:04:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Infra | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tobias Fiebig
2015-02-09 18:03:52 UTC
removed 3.5.0 flag to allow tr 3.5.1, this still need a 3.5.z flag approved. By design each custom agent should appear in the CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping if you have no option for intelmodular then the value of CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping should be "intelmodular:" Please try that and report your findings Working. Suggest closing this not-a-bug then. Still, it would kind of be nice to see this reflected in the corresponding documentation. revise that. With options set as you suggested, i can configure it correctly (adding port=N in the options field), and a test succeedes. After saving the configuration, the port-parameter however disappears from the options list, and power-management fails as the plug-specification is missing. I had updated the documentation to include what you had suggested in comment #4 Can you please specify why you are sending the port field in the options and not using the dedicated port field with the corresponding mappings ? Because there is no port-field if CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping is set to "intelmodular:". If it is set to "intelmodular:port=port" a field labled "SSH-Port" appears. There are only two options 1) If the PM card requires port then the value should be in the UI SSH Port field and the CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping should map the port to the real parameter of the fence agent ("intelmodular:port=port" for intel modular) 2) If the PM card does not require port then it should appear in CustomVdsFenceOptionMapping with empty settings ("yyy:") 1), i guess. Closing not a bug. Seems like i did not really wrap my head around this mapping stuff yet. Sorry for bothering. |