Bug 1193044
Summary: | Qt linked with gold crash on startup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | dvratil, jakub, jgrulich, jreznik, kevin, manisandro, nickc, rdieter, rnovacek, than |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Patch |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 2.25-13.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-08-27 17:57:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Rex Dieter
2015-02-16 13:02:02 UTC
See upstream bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16992 We can workaround this by not using gold in Qt builds (on f22+) until it is fixed (fyi, initial comments were copied from bug #1083664) (hopefully) temporary workaround in qt5-qtbase builds: %changelog * Mon Feb 16 2015 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 5.4.0-13 - -no-use-gold-linker (f22+, #1193044) removing as blocker while I we have a workaround. Looks like there is an upstream fix available, could you consider backporting the fix into fedora's packaging? Looks like upstream fix is available now: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e9c1bdad269c0c3352eebcc9481ed65144001b0b Ping, any reason(s) not to use the upstream patch? I'd be happy to help apply it to fedora's packaging if there are no objections. Hi Rex,
> Ping, any reason(s) not to use the upstream patch?
>
> I'd be happy to help apply it to fedora's packaging if there are no
> objections.
None from me. Please go ahead.
Cheers
Nick
It would appear that f22 and subsequent branches (f23/master) are tracking different versions currently: f22 2.25 f23+ 2.25.1 I'll make the change to master, probably merge back to f23. How would you prefer to handle f22? merge (and upgrade 2.25 -> 2.25.1) or cherry-pick? Hi Rex, Cherry pick please. Upgrading to 2.25, whilst a nice idea, is likely to introduce more problems than it fixes. Cheers Nick binutils-2.25-13.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14227 binutils-2.25-13.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update binutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14227 binutils-2.25-13.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. fyi, matching f22 update for posterity, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14243 |