Bug 1193798

Summary:	[RFE] Order capsule lifecycle environments in capsule form
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Component:	Capsule - Content	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	6.0.7	CC:	bbuckingham, bkearney, cwelton
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Reopened
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-09-04 19:07:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pavel Moravec 2015-02-18 09:17:11 UTC

Description of problem:
There is confusing ordering of lifecycle environments in capsule L.E. tab. The ordering is alphabetical, while it would be beneficial to have it ordered per L.E. "promotion chain". I.e. having L.E. Library -> Devel -> QE -> Production, I would like to see L.E.s ordered:
Library
Devel
QE
Production

while I see ordering:
Dev
Library
Production
QE


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Sat 6.0.7


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create lifecycle environments chain Library -> Dev -> QE -> Production
2. Install an external capsule
3. Open L.E. tab for the capsule and check ordering of the L.E.s


Actual results:
The ordering is alphabetical.


Expected results:
The ordering should be "promotion chain" based.


Additional info:

Comment 2 Bryan Kearney 2017-11-09 19:07:12 UTC

hammer capsule list now supports the --order flag which resolves this issue.

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2017-11-09 19:07:54 UTC

wrong bug.

Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2018-09-04 18:56:34 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2018-09-04 19:07:11 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.