Bug 1196290

some comments:

- please remove the scl macros, they are not needed for fedora
- remove group: this is only needed if you intend building for epel5
- remove BuildRoot: this is only needed if you intend building for epel5
- remove defattr, this is not needed anymore
- add ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch for fedora > 19
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js#ExclusiveArch
- move license from %doc to %license
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines
- add %check sections with tests, see package.json how to call the tests

Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-wcwidth/nodejs-wcwidth.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-wcwidth/nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-4.fc23.src.rpm

You should add npm(defaults) to the BR needed for tests.

%if 0%{enable_tests}
BuildRequires:  npm(tape)
BuildRequires:  npm(defaults)
%endif


spec file in srpm differs from spec file from url. Could you please rebuild the srpm with the correct specfile?

Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-wcwidth/nodejs-wcwidth.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-wcwidth/nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc23.src.rpm

APPROVED,

There is one issue which you can fix before importing:

nodejs-wcwidth.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/isaacs/wcwidth HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Url:        https://github.com/isaacs/wcwidth

You can use:
Url:        https://www.npmjs.com/package/wcwidth



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/piotr/rpmbuild/1196290-nodejs-
     wcwidth/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc23.noarch.rpm
          nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc23.src.rpm
nodejs-wcwidth.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wcswidth -> widths
nodejs-wcwidth.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/isaacs/wcwidth HTTP Error 404: Not Found
nodejs-wcwidth.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-wcwidth.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/wcwidth/node_modules/defaults /usr/lib/node_modules/defaults
nodejs-wcwidth.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wcswidth -> widths
nodejs-wcwidth.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/isaacs/wcwidth HTTP Error 404: Not Found
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Requires
--------
nodejs-wcwidth (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    nodejs(engine)
    npm(defaults)



Provides
--------
nodejs-wcwidth:
    nodejs-wcwidth
    npm(wcwidth)



Source checksums
----------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/wcwidth/-/wcwidth-1.0.0.tgz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 27506810de2d33233757202d705391f380f4dcc269036bc669d8e0e928f967a3
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 27506810de2d33233757202d705391f380f4dcc269036bc669d8e0e928f967a3


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1196290
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

URL fixed

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nodejs-wcwidth
Short Description: Port of C's wcwidth() and wcswidth()
Upstream URL: https://www.npmjs.com/package/wcwidth
Owners: zvetlik humaton
Branches: f20 f21 f22
InitialCC: humaton

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Built into f23 it seems...

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: nodejs-wcwidth
Short Description: Port of C's wcwidth() and wcswidth()
Upstream URL: https://www.npmjs.com/package/wcwidth
Owners: zvetlik
Branches: el6 epel7

Git done (by process-git-requests).

nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-6.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-6.fc21

nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc22

nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.

nodejs-wcwidth-1.0.0-6.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.