Bug 119662
Summary: | RFE: Make up2date refresh list of available packages more intelligently | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 | Reporter: | Mike MacCana <mmaccana> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Adrian Likins <alikins> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fanny Augustin <fmoquete> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-04-13 01:13:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mike MacCana
2004-04-01 06:58:25 UTC
Internal RFE bug #120073 entered; will be considered for future releases. I don't really like this idea. For starters, up2date only updates the indexes when something has actually changed (either via channel timestamp info from login for RHN use, or via If-Last-Modified calls for yum/apt). dir repos are admittedly kind of dumb in this regard though. Note that while the user interface may indicate that it is fetching this info, "fetching" includes getting it from a local cache. So adding a manual apt style refresh/update seems like a bad idea to me. It seems like it would just lead to users trying to work with data that is old and incorrect. Thanks for your reply Adrian. <i>For starters, up2date only updates the indexes when something has actually changed ... "fetching" includes getting it from a local cache.</i> Ah - I wasn't aware of that. That's precisely the behavior I was asking for. Thanks. |