Bug 1198518
Summary: | inaccurate description of getSecurityModel API | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | lcheng |
Component: | libvirt-python | Assignee: | Ján Tomko <jtomko> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | dyuan, honzhang, jdenemar, mzhan, weizhan |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-python-1.2.14-1.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 05:34:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
lcheng
2015-03-04 10:29:38 UTC
commit 713ed9d570df92b3ba029b4cbb3cd7a4c45bf1de Author: Ján Tomko <jtomko> CommitDate: 2015-03-05 16:08:51 +0100 Clarify description for virNodeGetSecurityModel s/host/hypervisor/ to match the wording used by the C binding. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198518 git describe: v1.2.13-1-g713ed9d Verify it as follows. The result is expected. Move its status to VERIFIED. # rpm -q libvirt-python libvirt-python-1.2.15-1.el7.x86_64 # vim /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py 3809 def getSecurityModel(self): 3810 """Extract information about the hypervisor security model """ 3811 ret = libvirtmod.virNodeGetSecurityModel(self._o) 3812 if ret is None: raise libvirtError ('virNodeGetSecurityModel() failed', conn=self) 3813 return ret Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2203.html |