Bug 1198539
Summary: | TC8: Please specify what you means by strong password in bottom bar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pravin Satpute <psatpute> |
Component: | libpwquality | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | g.kaviyarasu, jonathan, tmraz, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-12-20 15:18:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Pravin Satpute
2015-03-04 10:41:43 UTC
Anaconda already displays the messages from libpwquality concerning the password. If you feel these messages are insufficient, they would need to be improved in libpwquality. (In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #0) > Additional info: > Desktop/Laptop level user does not care much about password, since that > machine remains with them all the time. > I have seen number of people just single character as a password. Since they > need to login to machine 100 times a day. > > Good if we can avoid this strong password criteria and ease life of laymen > users. There is already an option to create a user with no password at all. Instead of using useless passwords, I would recommend using no passwords. Aha, i missed that option. Still there is need to mention what is meant by fair, strong password. I noticed if i increase length of password still it makes it fair password. Good to inform that to user. In Fedora Beta, i see user can use his choice of password by pressing "Done" twice. If that is final, then we can close this bug. We are not going to pursue this RFE at this point. If anyone wishes to work on this I'd suggest creating pull request on libpwquality upstream. https://github.com/libpwquality/libpwquality |