Bug 1199860
Summary: | [abrt] yum: transaction.py:72:addInstall:error: adding package to transaction failed | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sergio Basto <sergio> | ||||||
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 21 | CC: | admiller, ffesti, jzeleny, lkardos, novyjindrich, packaging-team-maint, pez, pknirsch, urkle | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
URL: | https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/643c590951e3470d1f5a32d42241abe73c0e83c3 | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:c8f9a61fbd3ab0f5566c7ce2872491696d14e746 | ||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2015-12-02 09:54:16 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Sergio Basto
2015-03-09 02:18:52 UTC
Created attachment 999422 [details]
File: backtrace
Created attachment 999423 [details]
File: environ
well mock prints this before traceback which is the problem error: Failed to dlopen /usr/lib/rpm-plugins/selinux.so /usr/lib/rpm-plugins/selinux.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 why I got rpm-plugin-selinux.i686 on system I don't know ... and yum remove rpm-plugin-selinux-4.12.0.1-4.fc21.i686 fixes this issue . This makes it impossible to create a 32bit mock root on 64bit linux now unless you remove the 32bit rpm libs (rpm-plugin-selinux.i686 which removes rpm-libs.i686) is there some flag that mock should be specifying to yum to disable the loading of this plugin when it's creating a mock root? Yeah, I just ran into that issue as well and ended up just creating a 32-bit VM in the meantime, though deleting rpm-plugin-selinux.i686 is probably a less drastic workaround. It'd be nice if there was a flag or something to allow it to work without deleting packages... This is a bug in the rpm pluginsystem. Right now it uses %__plugindir %{_libdir}/rpm-plugins which depends on the architecture given to rpm not the architecture rpm is build for. On the rpm cli --noplugins can be used to disable the plugins as a workaround. This message is a reminder that Fedora 21 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 21. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '21'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 21 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 21 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-12-01. Fedora 21 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |