Bug 1200540

Summary:	Incremental update publishes/promotes to incorrect lifecycle environments of a composite content view
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	sthirugn <sthirugn>
Component:	Content Management	Assignee:	Justin Sherrill <jsherril>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	sthirugn <sthirugn>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1.0	CC:	bbuckingham, jmontleo, mmccune
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9799
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-08-12 05:29:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1130651

Description sthirugn@redhat.com 2015-03-10 19:16:49 UTC

Description of problem:
Incremental update publishes/promotes to incorrect lifecycle environments of a composite content view

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-6-20150303.0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a content view cv1 and publish v1.0 and promote to Library, QE. Register and subscribe a content host ch1 to cv1 -> QE
2. Create a composite content view ccv2, add cv1 to it.  Publish v1.0 - promote to Library, QE. Register and subscribe a content host ch2 to ccv2 -> QE
3. Go to Content -> Errata -> Select an errata which is applicable to both content hosts ch1 and ch2
4. Click Apply Errata
5. Both ch1 and ch2 will show up
6. Just select ch1, click Next
7. Click the check box to immediately apply the errata to the content host.  Click confirm.

Actual results:
1 - cv1 is published with v1.1 for QE (works as expected)
2 - ch1 received the errata (works as expected)
3 - cch2 is published with v1.1 for both Library, QE (not sure why cch2 is published to both Library, QE) (Not works as expected)


Expected results:
For the 3rd item above, I really dont know the expected result, this is a design question

Additional info:

Comment 3 Justin Sherrill 2015-03-17 20:29:58 UTC

Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9799 from this bug

Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2015-03-18 22:05:25 UTC

Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9799 has been closed
-------------
Justin Sherrill
Applied in changeset commit:katello|3817b397dcb2a50fbf3682e9c06c3ec0e6190f90.

Comment 7 sthirugn@redhat.com 2015-03-24 20:26:13 UTC

Verified.

Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-7-20150320.1

Verification steps:
1. Create a content view cv1 and publish v1.0 and promote to Library, QE. Register and subscribe a content host ch1 to cv1 -> QE
2. Create a composite content view ccv2, add cv1 to it.  Publish v1.0 - promote to Library, QE. Register and subscribe a content host ch2 to ccv2 -> QE
3. Go to Content -> Errata -> Select an errata which is applicable to both content hosts ch1 and ch2
4. Click Apply Errata
5. Both ch1 and ch2 will show up
6. Just select ch1, click Next
7. Click the check box to immediately apply the errata to the content host.  Click confirm.

Actual results:
1 - cv1 is published with v1.1 for QE (works as expected)
2 - ch1 received the errata (works as expected)
3 - ccv2 is not updated at all (works as expected)

Comment 8 Bryan Kearney 2015-08-11 13:29:04 UTC

This bug is slated to be released with Satellite 6.1.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-12 05:29:35 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:1592