Bug 1200910
| Summary: | aarch64 in %arm macro? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ffesti, jzeleny, lkardos, mjuszkie, novyjindrich, packaging-team-maint, pknirsch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-03-20 12:56:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
%arm is for 32-bit arm (armv5te in older Fedora, arm7hl in newer, probably armv6 in pidora) aarch64 is 64-bit architecture and does not have so much common with 32-bit ones. x86 is separated from x86-64... |
Description of problem: I think aarch64 is ARM and should be listed in %arm macro (please correct me if I am wrong). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm-4.12.0.1-7.fc23.1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm --eval %arm Actual results: no aarch64 Expected results: aarch64 Additional info: I had to add the following workaround to my packages: %ifarch %{arm} aarch64 ...