Bug 1202794
| Summary: | dnf distro-sync -x misbehaves | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Mach <dmach> | ||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-03-17 16:48:07 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Daniel Mach
2015-03-17 12:59:07 UTC
Hello. I can only guess since you did not provide the debugging data (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#depsolving-problem) but on my machine, python-django strictly requires the same version of python-django-bash-completion. "dnf -x python-django --releasever=22 distro-sync" means: "synchronize everything except python-django" which includes "python-django-bash-completion". But the bash completion package cannot be removed since it is required by the exceptional "python-django". So, your request is contradictory and thus you see the expected behavior. Can I close this as NOTABUG or would you like to transform this report into a request for a new command/switch? I over-simplified the example, sorry :) I excluded both python-django and python-django-bash-completion. I still think it's a bug. Created attachment 1002876 [details] debugdata for the same analysis as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099342#c20 OK, then I think that this is a duplicate of bug 1099342 since the analysis made in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099342#c20 had similar results in this case. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1099342 *** |