Bug 1204462

Summary: build brltty against at-spi2-core instead of at-spi
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Component: brlttyAssignee: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: gwync, jskarvad
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-24 10:00:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Peter Robinson 2015-03-22 09:44:31 UTC
The current release of brltty supports the newer at-spi2 but it's still built against at-spi. It would be better to use the newer library rather than the obsolete at-spi

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-03-23 17:35:10 UTC
Added subpackage at-spi2

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2015-03-23 17:43:55 UTC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/brltty.git/commit/?id=a4b0abaad983acc17c01f768deb500c7f29c6cbb

Looking at the commit you drop the build req
-BuildRequires: at-spi-devel

And add a new package for at-spi2 but don't remove and obsolete the old at-spi sub package which means the package would likely still be there and empty. I plan on retiring the old package as soon as nothing depends on it (there is this and one other dep)

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-03-23 17:48:18 UTC
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #2)

> And add a new package for at-spi2 but don't remove and obsolete the old
> at-spi sub package which means the package would likely still be there and
> empty.
>
No, it is not empty. It now supports both API.

> I plan on retiring the old package as soon as nothing depends on it
> (there is this and one other dep)
>
Sorry, I didn't get it, so I will kill the at-spi.

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2015-03-23 17:50:39 UTC
> Sorry, I didn't get it, so I will kill the at-spi.

Sorry, it's long been dead, it has one other user which in itself is dead upstream.