Bug 1205777
| Summary: | Review Request: gap-pkg-autpgrp - Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jerry James <loganjerry> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | gil cattaneo <puntogil> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, puntogil |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | puntogil:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc22 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-06-10 19:10:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1205904 | ||
|
Description
Jerry James
2015-03-25 15:19:20 UTC
silly question: can you use texlive-pdftex-bin and texlive-tex-bin for re-generate documentation and htm files using make_doc script? Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines NOTE: manual review ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1205777-gap-pkg-autpgrp/srpm /review-gap-pkg-autpgrp/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: Using prebuilt rpms. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [-]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.2.8 starting (python version = 2.7.5)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled ccache Mock Version: 1.2.8 INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.8 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/gil/1205777-gap-pkg-autpgrp/srpm/gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc23.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/ --releasever 23 install /home/gil/1205777-gap-pkg-autpgrp/srpm/gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc23.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc23.noarch.rpm gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc23.src.rpm gap-pkg-autpgrp.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-autpgrp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-autpgrp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US abelian -> Belgian, Annabel, Anabel gap-pkg-autpgrp.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gap-pkg-autpgrp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-autpgrp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-autpgrp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US abelian -> Belgian, Annabel, Anabel 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Requires -------- gap-pkg-autpgrp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/update-gap-workspace gap-core Provides -------- gap-pkg-autpgrp: gap-pkg-autpgrp Source checksums ---------------- http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/~beick/soft/autpgrp/autpgrp-1.6.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : bf056b82b1b99b6b49d81d27576666410e7644220a26c5c0528e6e71617f9583 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bf056b82b1b99b6b49d81d27576666410e7644220a26c5c0528e6e71617f9583 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -vpn gap-pkg-autpgrp -m fedora-rawhide-i386 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 approved (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1) > silly question: > can you use texlive-pdftex-bin and texlive-tex-bin > for re-generate documentation and htm files > using make_doc script? That's not a silly question at all. This is what the GAPDoc package essentially does, and it is pulled in by the gap-core package. I will see what needs to be done to make this happen. Probably all of the other gap packages need similar tweaks. (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3) > approved Thank you very much for the review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gap-pkg-autpgrp Short Description: Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP Upstream URL: http://www.icm.tu-bs.de/~beick/so.html Owners: jjames Branches: f22 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc22 gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. gap-pkg-autpgrp-1.6-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. |