Bug 1210045
| Summary: | AVC Denials after i386 Workstation netinst | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mike Ruckman <mruckman> |
| Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | awilliam, dominick.grift, dwalsh, lvrabec, mgrepl, plautrba, pschindl, robatino |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-04-27 09:37:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1043130 | ||
|
Description
Mike Ruckman
2015-04-08 18:48:18 UTC
The denials are for: - usesradd - gdm-session-worker - polkitd - colord - cupsd All for "read" under "Attempted Access." Do you have these AVCs? Personally, I think this domains trying to read /etc/localtime. Could you confirm this? Thank you. FWIW I didn't see this on an x86_64 Workstation network install today which got selinux-policy -122. Discussed at today's blocker review meeting [1]. It was decided to delay the decision - adamw couldn't reproduce this today and the report is short on detail, let's give roshi a chance to provide more info [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-20/ Here are the selinux logs. -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/214975/42982639/ Lukas, looks like you're correct. I've only seen this on i386 and only when g-i-s is used to create the user. If you create the user in anaconda there are no denials. -122 was installed. Sorry it took me so long to respond :( *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1190377 *** |