Bug 1210772
| Summary: | Problem/Messages Panel is shared between separate users | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] JBoss BPMS Platform 6 | Reporter: | Anton Giertli <agiertli> |
| Component: | Business Central | Assignee: | Walter Medvedeo <wmedvede> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0.3 | CC: | alazarot, jlocker, kverlaen, manstis |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-03-27 20:01:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Anton Giertli
2015-04-10 14:17:30 UTC
6.1.0.GA is affected by this. Users should be aware that the section was renamed to Messages in 6.1. I am not totally sure that this is really an unexpected behaviour. I see the business-central as a collaborative tool. If I am working in a project and I save a process in a inconsistent state I think reasonable that every logged user working in the same BPM Suite instance (and with visibility for that process) see the error. If I am working in a rule of a project, where a different user is working in a process in the same project - and I or the other user save something with errors, we need to inform all users about that or the build will not succeed. Is not that expected ? I've re tested how it's working with last 6.3.x branch build, and I confirm that both users can see the error. i.e. 1) login with user_a in session1 2) login with user_b in session2 3) user_a opens/creates a drl file, breaks it by typing a non valid sentence, and saves the file. 4) user_a can see the error message 5) user_b can see the error message This is the semantic we have since the first wb version, and my understanding is that since both users can see the projects at the same time, and also work with them, both are interested on knowing if a given project is broken. If not, we can have weird scenarios where user_a breaks the project and user_b believes the project is ok, etc. In my opinion we should keep this semantic. |