Bug 1210932

Summary:	Incomplete RPM
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	fedora_account
Component:	nwchem	Assignee:	marcindulak <Marcin.Dulak>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	el6	CC:	Marcin.Dulak
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-04-11 09:13:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description fedora_account 2015-04-11 05:02:26 UTC

Description of problem:

After installation of this rpm set, we see that no executable is installed into the path, and the rpm contains no documentation describing any steps which must be taken to complete the installation.


nwchem-6.5.26243-15.el6.x86_64
nwchem-common-6.5.26243-15.el6.noarch
nwchem-openmpi-6.5.26243-15.el6.x86_64


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  yum install nwchem*    (from epel/testing)
2.  rpm -ql nwchem         (the nwchem rpm contains no files)
3.  rpm -ql nwchem-common  (contains numerous files but no executable or docs)
4.  rpm -ql nwchem-openmpi (contains one library file)

Actual results:
I would expect the nwchem program to be installed which is compatible with the rhel/epel environment.  If additional steps must be taken to complete the installation, then the documentation for these steps should be included in the rpms.

Expected results:
I would expect that either a working program would be installed into the path, or if additional installation steps are required then these steps should be described in documentation included in the rpms.


Additional info:

Comment 1 marcindulak 2015-04-11 09:13:27 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1105209 ***