Bug 1211039
Summary: | Add aspell-de to EPEL7 branch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Frank Büttner <bugzilla> |
Component: | aspell-de | Assignee: | Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugzilla, jchaloup |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-05-20 13:25:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Frank Büttner
2015-04-12 12:37:02 UTC
Frank, aspell is being replaced by hunspell. There are still some aspell-* packages but they are here mainly for compatibility reasons. RHEL7 already has hunspell-de package. Is there a particular reason to have aspell-de in epel7? Would not be hunspell-de a suitable substitute? Regards Jan I use roundcubemail which depends on php-pspell. And php-pspell depends on aspell. Hi Frank, I am sorry for my late response. This task has gotten to bottom of my TODO list :(. After some reading it has been a while since aspell vs. haspell issue was discussed. Can you help me with it? Can you search through mailing lists if there was such a discussion or some comparison? I have written mail to our mailing list. Waiting for response. Jan As written in [1]: "aspell is only included as a build requirement for hunspell dictionaries. All apps in RHEL use hunspell as their supported spell checker; it's recommended that other apps do the same wherever possible." So I recommend to report a bug for php-pspell to migrate to hunspell. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590700 |