Summary: | [aaa][kerbldap] freeIPA 4.x base dn should be obtained using defaultNamingContext | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | akotov | |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Martin Perina <mperina> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ondra Machacek <omachace> | |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | 3.6.0 | CC: | baumanmo, bazulay, bugs, gklein, iheim, jbuchta, lpeer, lsurette, msio57, omachace, oourfali, pstehlik, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, rhodain, yeylon, ykaul, ylavi | |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-3.6.0-rc | Keywords: | Reopened, ZStream | |
Target Release: | 3.6.0 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | 1171395 | |||
: | 1213772 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-03-09 21:02:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | Infra | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Bug Depends On: | 1171395 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1063095, 1196662, Engineering1197441, 1213772 |
Comment 6
Ondra Machacek
2015-06-22 15:14:51 UTC
Seems so. Alon? 389 has defaultNamingContext as far as I know. $ ldapsearch -H ldap://ldap.corp.redhat.com -b '' -s BASE -x -LLL defaultNamingContext dn: defaultNamingContext: dc=redhat,dc=com Yes, but engine uses namingContext, not defaultNamingContext. So we have same issue as with IPA. (In reply to Ondra Machacek from comment #9) > Yes, but engine uses namingContext, not defaultNamingContext. So we have > same issue as with IPA. oh! I thought the other way around. I truly do not think we should fix this legacy provider any more. the ipa fix was because of a change in ipa for existing customers. not my decision though. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0376.html |