Bug 1214698
Summary: | there is no protobuf package in F22 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmavrogi> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 22 | CC: | awilliam, brendan.jones.it, dennis, mizdebsk, nmavrogi, notting, robatino, shamardin |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-04-28 07:11:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1043130 |
Description
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2015-04-23 12:05:01 UTC
My main issue is compilation of protobuf-c. I got a mail: protobuf-c has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: protobuf-c-1.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.8()(64bit) Proposed as a Blocker for 22-final by Fedora user nmav using the blocker tracking app because: I received the following mail: protobuf-c has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: protobuf-c-1.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.8()(64bit) Some research in brew shows that the latest protobuf compilation failed and no other build was submitted since then: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/protobuf/builds The protocol buffers library is used by quite few packages. Not shipping it in F22 is a serious regression. $ repoquery --whatrequires protobuf|grep x86_64|wc -l 45 $ repoquery --whatrequires protobuf-c|grep x86_64|wc -l 13 I'm gonna assign this to 'distribution', because the f21 package should be in the 22 tree - I can't see any reason for it not to be. The package isn't orphaned for F22, nor does anything seem to obsolete it, so I can't see a reason why it shouldn't have the previous successful build. The mail that I have received may have been incorrect. I can scratch build in f22 so the package is certainly there. I'm closing this as it looks like a false alarm. Um. I thought the issue wasn't that the package isn't in the *scm*, it's that the package isn't in the *repositories*. I would expect https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/22/x86_64/os/Packages/p/ to contain whatever was the last successful build on the Rawhide branch before F22 branched from it, but it does not seem to. I see both protobuf-2.5.0-11.fc22.x86_64.rpm and protobuf-devel-2.5.0-11.fc22.x86_64.rpm in the URL you quote. definitely weren't there the two times I checked previously... |