Bug 1215076

Summary: Gnome Settings doesn't appear (or possible work)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rodd Clarkson <rodd>
Component: control-centerAssignee: Control Center Maintainer <control-center-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: baptiste.millemathias, bnocera, control-center-maint, czerny.jakub, fmuellner, kalevlember, michele, mkasik, nls1729, ofourdan, oholy, rstrode, tiagomatos, vpodzime, znmeb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-04-25 14:33:59 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rodd Clarkson 2015-04-24 08:52:12 UTC
Description of problem:

Opening Gnome Settings doesn't work.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

gnome-settings-daemon-3.16.1-1.fc22.x86_64


How reproducible:

Very


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try the following:
2.    Click in the top left corner of the screen, click the settings dialog.
3.    Right click the desktop and select settings.
4.    Click in the top left corner, select the Wi-Fi > Wi-Fi Settings

Actual results:

Nothing opening


Expected results:

Gnome Settings opens

Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2015-04-24 10:26:35 UTC
Probably a samba packaging bug. Does https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-April/126047.html help?

Comment 2 Rodd Clarkson 2015-04-24 10:39:46 UTC
Hmm, it looks like it might be related but the suggestion didn't fix it.  (And I'm not sure what it did do)

If I run gnome-control-center on the command line I get:

$ gnome-control-center 
gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2015-04-24 10:57:32 UTC
Maybe it needs an 'ldconfig' run to pick up the fixed libs? Not an expert on the samba alternatives setup :)

Comment 4 czerny.jakub 2015-04-24 20:12:10 UTC
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #1)
> Probably a samba packaging bug. Does
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2015-April/126047.html help?

No. The problem is that there is no package providing missing library for x86_64 arch.

$ gnome-control-center 
gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries: libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

$ dnf provides libwbclient.so.0
libwbclient-2:4.2.0-3.fc22.i686 : The winbind client library
Repo        : fedora

libwbclient-2:4.2.1-2.fc22.i686 : The winbind client library
Repo        : updates-testing

Comment 5 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 2015-04-25 02:05:11 UTC
(In reply to Rodd Clarkson from comment #2)
> Hmm, it looks like it might be related but the suggestion didn't fix it. 
> (And I'm not sure what it did do)
> 
> If I run gnome-control-center on the command line I get:
> 
> $ gnome-control-center 
> gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries:
> libwbclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Same here - was just about to report it but you beat me to it.

Comment 6 Rodd Clarkson 2015-04-25 04:53:57 UTC
Something got lost in translation last night, maybe due to the maintenance, but running ldconfig is necessary.

So, who needs to address this. Does this need to be moved across to libwbclient to address?

Comment 7 Kalev Lember 2015-04-25 11:10:09 UTC
Looks like it's already fixed in https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-4.2.1-4.fc22

However, let's keep this ticket open for a bit until the samba update gets pushed out to a repo. Otherwise we'll just have a number of people filing the same issue all over again against control-center.

Comment 8 Kalev Lember 2015-04-25 13:45:17 UTC
*** Bug 1215106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 9 Kalev Lember 2015-04-25 13:46:05 UTC
*** Bug 1215190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2015-04-25 14:33:59 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1214868 ***