Bug 1215121

Summary:	[RFE] Provide way to confirm capsule is in sync and up to date with server
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham>
Component:	Capsule	Assignee:	Katello Bug Bin <katello-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.1.0	CC:	ahumbe, bbuckingham, xdmoon
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-04-30 11:54:05 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	260381, 1115190

Description Brad Buckingham 2015-04-24 11:04:20 UTC

Description of problem:

It would be useful to have a way to determine if the content on a Capsule is up to date and in sync with the Satellite server.  In other words, verify that there is no difference in the content between the two servers.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Sat6.1 beta

Additional info:

This request was raised by AshishH during a Sat6.1 test day.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2015-04-24 11:23:28 UTC

Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.

Comment 3 Xixi 2015-04-30 07:00:24 UTC

(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> 
> It would be useful to have a way to determine if the content on a Capsule is
> up to date and in sync with the Satellite server.  In other words, verify
> that there is no difference in the content between the two servers.
> 

Could this be a duplicate of Bug 1171884 - [RFE] show if Capsules are synced in Satellite 6 webui ?

Comment 4 Brad Buckingham 2015-04-30 11:54:05 UTC

Xixi, good catch.  It does look like a duplicate.  I will close this one out. Thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1171884 ***