Bug 121889

Summary:	texi2html should not be included in tetex
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrice Dumas <patpertusus>
Component:	tetex	Assignee:	Jindrich Novy <jnovy>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	pknirsch, seandarcy
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-03-14 15:57:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Patrice Dumas 2004-04-28 21:28:42 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312

Description of problem:
texi2html is included in tetex, but it shouldn't. It is not clean, and
moreover the version used is Olaf's version and he doesn't maintain it
anymore. The development continued here:
http://texi2html.cvshome.org/

There is a spec file with the sources which was prepared for fedora. I
wanted to add texi2html to the extras at fedora.us, but it conflicts
with tetex.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. look in the spec file ?
2.
3.
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2004-04-30 13:07:53 UTC

Something we can look at for next time, but it's too late for FC2 now.

Comment 2 sean 2005-02-18 10:54:22 UTC

Now that it's not in tetex-3.0, don't we need a separate package?

FWIW, the spec file in texi2html 1.76 WFM.

Comment 3 Jindrich Novy 2005-02-18 11:32:47 UTC

Yes, I want to add separate packages for texi2html and latex2html packages. It's
likely to happen next week. (texi2html will be 1.76)

Comment 4 Jindrich Novy 2005-02-21 08:20:49 UTC

New texi2html package added.