Bug 121904

Summary:	WebUI for RHN Satellite configuration
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Todd Warner <taw>
Component:	Installer	Assignee:	Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fanny Augustin <fmoquete>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	switty
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-13 14:27:33 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	113401, 122005, 122668, 128532
Bug Blocks:	98360

Description Todd Warner 2004-04-29 00:11:05 UTC

In support of the RHN Satellite installation, we need to build out a
configuration  UI.

Need to configure:
o disconnected?
  admin email
  mountpoint(s)
o install RHN certificate
o set up oracle
o blow away install schema
o activate satellite locally (with RHN certificate)
o if not disconnected:
  - configure HTTP proxy/user/pass
  - register (?)
o configure/create ssl keys/certs (?)
o configure/create bootstrap scripts

Comment 1 Robin Norwood 2004-08-02 22:14:58 UTC

Ok - here's what the configuration page does now:

Admin e-mail
Mount point
Parent Server
HTTP proxy
enable monitoring backend
enable monitoring scout
mac address.

Other things on the list above are not supported for rhn350sat.  Get
over it.


Test plan: Go to 'Tools->Satellite Configuration' as org admin.  Make
sure the above settings work.

Comment 2 Fanny Augustin 2004-08-07 03:26:07 UTC

All of the fields are listed as expected, but I cannot modify them.  I
don't think this make sense.  If the fields are not supposed to be
modified, they should not be displayed within text fields.  They
should be displayed as text only.

Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2004-08-09 14:47:47 UTC

Fixed in CVS - all of the fields should be editable.

Comment 4 Fanny Augustin 2004-08-10 16:18:14 UTC

Looks good in QA.