Bug 1222631

Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1922
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Robert Thornthwaite <robert.thornthwaite>
Component: gccAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.1CC: mfranc, mpolacek
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-05-18 16:47:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Preprocessed source
none
Another Preprocessed source none

Description Robert Thornthwaite 2015-05-18 16:34:10 UTC 
Created attachment 1026768 [details]
Preprocessed source

Description of problem:
I am getting this error when I try to compile but in different code.   I have already submitted Bug 1217267 but I do not know if this is the same bug.

../../src/mnemosene/exe/LocalDatabaseDaemon.cpp:115:1: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1922
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
  gcc version 4.8.3 20140911 (Red Hat 4.8.3-9) (GCC) 


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Marek Polacek 2015-05-18 16:47:01 UTC 
Yes, that looks like the same issue.  With FSF 4.8 branch, this testcase doesn't ICE.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1217267 ***
Comment 3 Robert Thornthwaite 2015-05-18 16:54:08 UTC 
Created attachment 1026771 [details]
Another Preprocessed source

Here is another preprocessed source.  Maybe the same bug?
Comment 4 Marek Polacek 2015-05-18 16:59:24 UTC 
(In reply to Robert Thornthwaite from comment #3)
> Created attachment 1026771 [details]
> Another Preprocessed source
> 
> Here is another preprocessed source.  Maybe the same bug?

Yes.