Bug 122456
Summary: | evolution: cannot change Subject: encoding. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kunihiko IMAI <bak> |
Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | evolution-2.10.1-4.fc7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-10-02 18:49:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kunihiko IMAI
2004-05-04 19:09:44 UTC
Well, the problem here is that MUAs which doesn't support UTF-8 breaks its subject with replying - when it truncates the subject which isn't decoded say. Since evolution allows us to change the encoding for the body, hopefully it will supports to change the encoding for the subject as well. The original bug here is reported on Evolution 1.4.6; there's been activity on the upstream bug report referred to in comment #1 This may be partially fixed in Evolution 2.*: the upstream bug report has a patch which was partially applied in July 2004. How well does the code in FC3 perform? Well, presumably it will be decided from the body encoding. but, I can't type any Japanese at all on evo2.2 now because gtkhtml crashes. and when I just wrote Japanese on only Subject, it was still UTF-8, though. I should file a bug for this separately then. still happens in evolution-2.2.2-3 (yes, upstream bug is also not yet closed) Do you still encounter this problem in Fedora Core 6 or later? tried to send informaiton with JP-encoding (other than Unicode), on other machine got following detail with correct letter. ---------- Return-Path: <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX> Received: from [XX.XX.XX.XX] (XXXXXXXXXXXcom [10.65.6.180]) by XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4H6UPLk015212 for <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>; Thu, 17 May 2007 02:30:26 -0400 ਵਿਸ਼ਾ: て素賭芽委る ਵਲੋਂ: Pune-QE <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXcom> ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਜਵਾਬ: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXom ਵੱਲ: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXcom Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Organization: XXXXXXXX ਮਿਤੀ: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:00:23 +0530 Message-Id: <1179383423.14292.1.camel@XXXXXXX> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 (2.10.1-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Status: O X-UID: 399 Content-Length: 107 X-Keywords: --------- output seems ok tested with following version: evolution-2.10.1-4.fc7 evolution-data-server-1.10.1-1.fc7 Closing per comment #8. |